Re: Frame grabbers with bt8x8 chipset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



You may be right about economies of scale, but would you trust a WinTV card
for a real-time machine vision application? (and I stress the words 'real
time')

--
Georgios Kapetanakis
Department of Computer Science
University of York


----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Peach" <martinrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:08 PM
Subject: Re:  Frame grabbers with bt8x8 chipset


> Georgios Kapetanakis wrote:
> >
> > I don't want a TV/Tuner card.. thingy, because I want video only. No
sound,
> > no frills. Just video. Fewer things can go wrong this way ;) Also, frame
> > grabbers typically support bus-mastering, which is good for real-time
> > capturing, i.e. more predictable and more reliable. I might be wrong,
but
> > that's my requirements.
>
> I'm just saying that economies of scale mean that tv cards cost less
> than video-only cards and otherwise work the same. I think a WInTV costs
> aboout 1/10th of a Meteor and I can't tell the difference. The unused
> parts effectively go to sleep if you don't use them.
>
> /\/\/\/*=Martin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Video4linux-list mailing list
> Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux