Re: any reason why asm/byteorder.h is not used?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: any reason why asm/byteorder.h is not used?
From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Mar 2003 10:49:16 +0100
Delivered-to: video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1047811082.27981.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SuSE Labs, Berlin
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Ronald Bultje <rbultje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Is there any reason why asm/byteorder.h is not used (__LITTLE_ENDIAN and
> __BIG_ENDIAN)? With that, code would look like this (example):

No.  Fixed.

  Gerd

-- 
/join #zonenkinder

References:
- any reason why asm/byteorder.h is not used?
  - From: Ronald Bultje

Prev by Date: Latest Mar 13 saa7134 snapshot (was Re: xawtv, zapping and xinerama)
Next by Date: Re: funny fullscreen switch bug in xawtv
Previous by thread: any reason why asm/byteorder.h is not used?
Next by thread: TVAudio Patch for saa7134 Mar 13 snapshot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DVB] [Video Disk Recorder] [Asterisk] [Photo] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Util Linux NG] [Xfree86] [Free Photo Albums] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Women] [ALSA Users] [ALSA Devel] [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux