On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 11:47:30PM -0700, Seth David Schoen wrote: > > CSS licensing comes from the DVD CCA, which is associated with the > MPAA, not the RIAA. But the MPAA is just the motion picture version of the RIAA no? Same opressive type of organization, no? Or is the MPAA more reasonable than the RIAA? > MPAA doesn't directly control DVD CCA, but the > studios participate in it. I would be surprised to learn otherwise, re: the studios partipating in it. Somebody is using it to hold over the media hardware producing companies heads to get what they want and who is vested more than the studios? > The news about Macrovision and specs is interesting. Interesting in a "that's not exactly on the legal side of things" kinda way? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Attachment:
pgp2PrV0CITG0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
