On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 07:42:19PM -0500, Billy Biggs wrote: > > Most linux developers care about: > - Recording TV as a progressive stream at low resolution I think I know what progressive means in terms of video, but I think what I am missing is how can I get a progressive capture from an analog device that is receiving interlaced fields? Maybe I can't and a progressive capture is only meant to work from digital devices. > - Watching TV in a window at frame-rate not field-rate Not terribly interested in watching in a window myself. I want to watch on my TV plugged into my G400. > Some Linux developers care about these 'high quality' things: > - timecode [1] What is this? > - 59.94/50hz TV watching [2] So you play each field, one after the other scaled x2 to fill a normal frame's height? I tried tvtime but it was very juddery for me. The processor usage for it is: 2797 root 20 0 66352 20M 7464 R 74.8 5.3 1:15 X 3419 root 11 0 8252 8252 8000 S 13.4 2.1 0:01 tvtime Does it use Xv for scaling? My monitor's refresh is set to 75Hz. Could that be why it's so juddery? > - full-height/rate recording from consumer cards such as bt878 [3] I record at 640x480 with mp1e. Strangely enough I never see interlace artifacts but I think I should. > - inversing telecine [4] Don't need it (I don't think). My interest is recording from NTSC sources (like cable, or satellite, etc.) > - NLEs that can do nice compositing etc [5] Yes, I would like this. I do have some VHS video I would like to edit and put into an MPEG (or vice versa :-). > - field correct TV output [6] Do you mean actually interlacing out to the TV the way it comes across the air/cable? I have always thought the best way to get the same quality picture (smoothness-wise) you get from cable/air is to exactly record what you are getting and play it back as it was played originally, to interlaced devices. None of this field combining etc. b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Attachment:
pgpf1mr6m72Uy.pgp
Description: PGP signature