Re: Studio-grade hardware support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



  To reply to myself, I think I came across as being too pessimistic.
Let me summarize this way:

  Most linux developers care about:
   - Recording TV as a progressive stream at low resolution
   - Watching TV in a window at frame-rate not field-rate
   - Using capture cards for webcams

  Some Linux developers care about these 'high quality' things:
   - timecode [1]
   - 59.94/50hz TV watching [2]
   - full-height/rate recording from consumer cards such as bt878 [3]
   - inversing telecine [4]
   - NLEs that can do nice compositing etc [5]
   - field correct TV output [6]

  Most Linux developers don't care about:
   - support for hardware we can't afford (digimix, etc)
   - targeting professional studio markets (we're mostly all users)


  Sound reasonable?


 [1] Timecode decoding is in my V4L recorder:
     http://www.sf.net/projects/reetpvr/
 [2] Check out my deinterlacer, others apps also sorta doing full-seed
     output:
     http://dumbterm.net/graphics/tvtime/
 [3] I know my recorder intends to do this, I'm sure others do.
 [4] There is now lots of 3:2 pulldown inversion code in the linux
     scene, see my recorder for an off-line algorithm, mjpegtools has
     another, etc.
 [5] Check out: http://matterial.sf.net/ for one project, there are lots of
     other little NLE projects, mostly people with DV cams though.
 [6] I keep meaning to do this more.  The V4L2 API at least gives us the
     start of something we can write drivers for.

-- 
Billy Biggs
vektor@xxxxxxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux