Es schrieb "Miguel A. Rasero": > > oficina:~/prueba/linux-2.4.20# patch -p1 <patch-2.4.21-rc4-kraxel > patching file arch/x86_64/config.in > patching file include/scsi/scsi.h > patching file include/linux/major.h > patching file include/linux/chio.h > patching file drivers/scsi/ch.c > patching file drivers/scsi/Makefile > patching file drivers/scsi/Config.in > patching file arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c > Hunk #2 succeeded at 4315 (offset -154 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 5133 (offset -145 lines). > Hunk #4 succeeded at 5346 (offset -150 lines). > patching file arch/sparc64/config.in > patching file Documentation/scsi-changer.txt > patching file Documentation/Configure.help > patching file kernel/ksyms.c > patching file include/linux/videodev2.h > patching file include/linux/videodev.h > patching file drivers/media/video/v4l2-common.c > patching file drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c > patching file drivers/media/video/Makefile > oficina:~ > > Are normal this offsets? Can i have problem with using bttv-0.9.11 with > this offsets in the kernel? > Thanks > Hi Miguel, think this is ok, but you can also use only the 11-v4l2-api-2.4.21-rc4 patch from bytesex.org, without the scsi-media-changer. This one did apply sucessfully on a 2.4.21-ac4 some time ago and I still use it with saa7134-0.2.8 on a SiS-746fx board. Greetings Hermann --
