Re: Working well -- And now, for the quality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 04:35:53PM +0000, Stephen Davies wrote:
> 
> You need a higher bit rate.  Try somewhere like 2000-4000 kbits/sec for
> 352x288 type resolution,

Wow!  I never tried anything that high for that neighborhood
resolution.

> Well - I use mpeg1,

What tool are you using for your mpeg1?

> but you must have good input video quality and have to
> accept that you need an adequate bit rate.

What bitrate and resolution do you normally mpeg1 with?  I was using
mp1e 320x240@1800kb/s and was fairly satisfied with that for casual
watching.

> If I'm keeping stuff I recompress into Divx4

I have been considering this sort of process.  Record real-time with
an mpeg1 tool (mp1e would be nice if the A/V stayed in sync) and
convert it to Divx4 in batch mode with a niced down CPU.

> - mencoder (part of
> mplayer) is working well for me.

I will try that.  I have been playing with trying to record real-time
with it but it's "record from tv" command line a bit futched.

> Shrinks my files to 1/3rd original size,
> but Divx compression is much much CPU heavier than mpeg1.

Indeed!  Too much for "time shifting" on an AMD Athlon-800.

b.

-- 
Brian J. Murrell





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux