> I don't know - I don't see anything in the interface design that can do > anything more than v4l2. In fact, for high speed capturing I can see a > number of possible catches. I agree. The contingous capture basically removes all syncronisation between driver and application and thus leads to plenty of race conditions and other headage. Applications can't stall capture if they can't keep up, instead old (maybe not processed yet) data gets overwritten. And if you want something generic to control devices, the v4l2 controls allow you to do that. Also note that devfs is still experimental, I don't like the idea to build something on top of devfs. /me stopped using devfs recently btw. Gerd -- Netscape is unable to locate the server localhost:8000. Please check the server name and try again.
