mschimek@xxxxxx writes: > Hi, > > I second Tom's proposal. /me too for the PRIO part ... > Accordingly we could have a V4L2_BUF_TYPE_EVENT and extend struct > v4l2_format to set up the event mechanism. I was thinking about exactly the same while reading the event proposal. > Marginally related it turned out a vbi proxy must recognize video and > vbi device names referring to the same physical device. Why? With v4l2 you can just use /dev/video all the time and put the file handle into vbi mode using S_FMT. And for v4l1 devices it doesn't help if we adjust the v4l2 API ... > The spec could require a unique bus_info, if only enumerating > devices when the driver has no other information. That is the easiest I think. > Here's the bttv patch: Zilch - the field is already properly > initialized. *grin* Gerd -- sigfault
