Re: Re: v4l2 api

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Gerd Knorr wrote:
> 
> A TUNER bit is still present, IMHO a _simple_ check to see whenever some
> tuner is present or not is useful.

Just for the records, when is a simple check advantageous?

> It is still there, named "V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OVERLAY" now.

Ok, my bad.
 
> >  * READ/WRITE/STREAMING - Actually I thought this was never in question
> >    (unlike optional ioctls just returning -EINVAL). I always liked to
> >    enable the appropriate i/o routines without much ado. What's the
> >    alternative?
> 
> read/write/streaming not being optional (but mandatory like select
> support)?

I don't see a good reason why r/w and/or streaming must be mandatory.
Is there?

Michael





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux