I just realised that I haven't explained what my use of the frame grabber is. I am trying to build a machine vision system. The idea is really straight-forward. I capture individual frames at 25fps or every 40 ms (PAL standard). The capturing format is YUV 4:2:2. Once I have captured a frame, I process it by feeding it into a vision processing library. Once this is done, I get the next frame, process it and so on. I understand that for you guys this is dead simple, but you can also realise that the chipset shouldn't be really important, since I am not using any fancy functionality. Mind you, I don't understand the use of the chipset in a frame grabber, that is where it fits in. I'm just using the board as a means to getting frames from a PAL camera fast. Nothing more. I hope this helps clarify what I'm trying to do. Once again, thank you. -- Georgios Kapetanakis Department of Computer Science University of York ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan McIvor" <alan.mcivor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:52 PM Subject: Re: About a frame grabber > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:37:06 +0100 > "Georgios Kapetanakis" <georgios@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I've also checked what Charlie told me, but since I have excellent > > recommendations for the Omnimedia P1S, I'm reluctant to look for something > > else. And it's a good guarantee to have a Meteor (even a cloned one). > > > > I have used both BT878 based cards and the Omnimedia P1S extensively > and can say from experience that BT878 based framegrabbers are far > better than the Omnimedia P1S in nearly every way. Price in > particular: a framegrabber containing just a BT878 (that is, with no > sound support) will be only 1/10th the cost of a Omnimedia P1S. > > Alan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Video4linux-list mailing list > Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
