On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Chris Gettings wrote: > We get the same problem with using the decimation register. We are not > driver experts, but suspect that the V4L driver must be patched. Is there > anyone on this list who could help with that? Thanks. When I played around with the bt848 temporal decimation years ago with the pre-v4l driver, I also found it worked strangely. The problem Kevin noted where he would get the same field returned again must be a driver problem. The bt848 does not have a field store, so there is no way it could be re-capturing an old field. I think it's pretty clear that what's happening is that the bt848 is dropping a field and the driver is just returning the data from the old buffer.
