Re: how true is this?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi Jack,

On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 18:33, jack craig wrote:
[broadcast2k]
> it asserted that V4L2 had been abandoned due academic reasons.

Never believe heroinewarrior when they say this kind of stuff... Would
you believe them if they said that they had removed their software from
their website due to liabi-... Erm, nevermind.

Anyway, not, it's not true.

> i want to add new hw support and had planned to start with v4l2.

Good thing, though v4l1 backwards compatibility might be a good thing
too (since many apps still support only v4l1).

Ronald

-- 
-   .-.
-   /V\    | Ronald Bultje <rbultje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-  // \\   | Running: Linux 2.4.18-XFS and OpenBSD 3.0
- /(   )\  | http://ronald.bitfreak.net/
-  ^^-^^





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux