On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:31:12AM -0500, Billy Biggs wrote: > > I'm more concerned about the problem of setting your monitor to > close-to-59.94hz and then ensuring that each field is shown for exactly > one refresh. Isn't this a feature of some video cards like the G400 for instance? Does it not automatically set the refresh to the TV standard when you use the TV-Out feature of the card? Maybe it doesn't and that's why I am still seeing slight judder. Trying to come up with video timings that properly fill and center the picture on the screen while also maintaining the exact frame rate is near impossible is it not? > Right now I run my deinterlacer at > 800x600@130hz which means that I see some aliasing but it's much more > watchable than 59.94 with dropping/doubling random frames... Why are you getting doubling and dropping of random frames at 59.94? Is that refresh not ideal? When you display the frames (field really from my understanding of our past conversations), you are doubling each scanline so that each field becomes the size of a full height frame right? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Attachment:
pgpNBJG09rJFo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
