Re: (no subject)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 15 Feb 01 at 10:07, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > would take a seperate sequencer instruction to the bt848 DMA controller each
> > > time you want to reset the address back to the start.  It's not going to work
> > > if you want to do this for every pixel, but you had a window 16 or 32 pixels
> > > wide in the FPGA's PCI address space, you could probably do it.
> > 
> > Since the 848 will burst in order the obvious approach to me would be to map
> > the FPGA 32bit wide FIFO register across an entire 2Mb of PCI space. Just
> > forget to decode a few bits 8)
> 
> Doesn't nvidia have a patent on this?  I thought one of things they sued 3dfx
> over was mapping a register over an address range, so burst transfers that are
> designed to write blocks of memory can write to a single register efficiently.

As matrox does it since Millennium I (at least, I never looked at their ISA
cards) with their pseudoDMA window, I do not think that nvidia can ever win 
such lawsuit.
                                            Best regards,
                                                Petr Vandrovec
                                                vandrove@xxxxxxxxxx
                                                





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux