Tuukka Toivonen <tuukkat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > However, it maps VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV420 and VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV420P > both into same V4L2 format. According to V4L docs, the first should be > interleaved and the second planar. Which V4L docs you are talking about? Documentation/video4linux/API.html just says this ... VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV420 YUV420 capture VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV411 YUV411 capture ... not clearly stating whenever they are planar or not. I think there is no driver which actually uses them. As far I know VIDEO_PALETTE_YUYV (+VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV422) and VIDEO_PALETTE_UYVY are the packed pixel (i.e. interleaved) ones and the others planar. > Same thing happens for > VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV411 and VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV411P. I don't see any mapping for VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV411 in my version of the file ... > Also, are the VIDEO_PALETTE_HI240 and VIDEO_PALETTE_RAW > documented anywhere? RAW is raw scanline data sampled (before PAL decoding etc. takes place). HI240 is a 6x6x6 dithered color cube, 8 bit/pixel. Gerd -- Weil die späten Diskussionen nicht mal mehr den Rotwein lohnen. -- Wacholder in "Melanie"
