Re: v4l2 api

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On  9 Oct 02 at 16:21, Gerd Knorr wrote:

I thought that I'll let it be, as I'm satisfied with both old and
new v4l2 API, but as my mail from lklm was forwarded here...
 
>  * drop all effect stuff
>    That was planned anyway.  Nobody uses it (yet).  And I suspect nobody
>    ever will.  Processors become faster, and special hardware is more
>    expencive + less flexible.
> 
>    what about the video output stuff btw.  Does anybody use that?

I'm trying, as G450/G550 TVOut hardware support is pure crap, which does 
only 1:1 picture to screen, so it is really asking for v4l2 interface 
instead of for framebuffer interface. Only problem is that it displays only
card's videomemory, and does only full PAL/NTSC, so I have problems
how to feed data to the videocard fast enough...

>  * replace stamp_t with struct timeval, drop all time functions.
>    We'll simply use gettimeofday like everybody else.

What about 'struct timespec' used by nanosleep? It has nanosecond
resolution, so you can timestamp outgoing pixels, if you have such need...

Currently I use from output API only ioctls for setting output
parameters, so I do not think that matroxfb is best example of
output driver.
                                    Best regards,
                                            Petr Vandrovec
                                            vandrove@xxxxxxxxxx
                                            





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux