Re: Experiences with RH 7.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I've been using the 7.2 Beta for about a week, with pretty heavy use. 
V4L2 has been doing OK here.

gerry
--
"Darragh O Flanagan (EEI)" wrote:
> 
> hi there,
> 
> I was wondering if anybdy could shed some light on how v4l2 installs /performs with RH 7.2 out of the box?
> 
> A project I am running requires users to do hefty work with RH7.1
> before they can get things going. I could just bundle everything, but don't want to....
> 
> Rather than spending a lot of time testing it all running again with 7.2, I was wondering if anybody has already done this. If so, have the problems with the default installation of RH7.1, been solved with the latest release? (loadable module support detection by videodevX)
> 
> Basically I'm trying to find a distro which will require the least effort
> for users to get going with our v4l2 applications.
> 
> //daragh
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Video4linux-list mailing list
> Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux