Re: Re[2]: [more about divx :-) format mutations please!]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> encoder is roughly 4 times slower than DivX 4.0 ( but I think that it's
> faster than OpenDivX ),
> and decoder is somewhat slower ( also compared to DivX 4.0 w/max
> postprocessing ). It can
> become a really good codec if open-source community spends enough time on
> its optimization.

Its fairly optimised anyway so it may well be generically slower. The big 
advantage it has over mp3 audio + mpeg4 subset video is in the patent
minefield dept





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux