I have measured the raw performance of reiserfs against ext2. the difference is a hit of around 10-15% (reiserfs is slower because of the journaling). However, this is offset by a very fast fsck (esp. with 100+GB) should you ever need to re-boot.
I use the meta/md drivers to do striping, and generally get 25 MB/s write rate with 3 drives, so the hit is not really a problem. FYI read rate is around 30-35 MB/s with 3 drives. This is just using the standard on-board UDMA IDE controllers.
Ed-T.
Peter Kaczowka wrote:
And also, in spite of the original mail asking for "personal mail", can
everyone who replies please cc this list, as is done below? I am also
interested, particularly in the performance of reiserfs.
Thanks,
Peter Kaczowka
"Gleicon S. Moraes" wrote:No, but I am trying to remember who did a videocapture program who recorded
in a raw partition !
It was damn fast, but I can't remember the name.
If some of you are the developer, or remember the website, please, drop me a
line .
Regards
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerd Bitzer" <gbitzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:39 PM
Subject: xfsHi listmembers,
may be that sounds OT, but has anybody of you tried to do video
recording on filesystems of type xfs
(http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/) or reiserfs or jfs and wants to
share hi! s/her experience regarding this topic, preferably personal mail
?
_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
