Re: v4l2 + select() + read()

• To: video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: v4l2 + select() + read()
• From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: 31 May 2001 07:23:44 GMT
• Delivered-to: video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Newsgroups: lists.linux.video4linux
• Organization: [x] network byte order
• User-agent: slrn/0.9.7.0 (Linux)

>  Is it really a problem to allocate space for one buffer to DMA to in case a
>  tool uses only read()?

No.  I just want the v4l2 specs being clear at this point to have
consistent behavior of the drivers and avoid the mess we currently
have with v4l1.

  Gerd

-- 
Gerd Knorr <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxxx>  --  SuSE Labs, Außenstelle Berlin

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: v4l2 + select() + read()
    • From: Nemosoft Unv.

• References:
  • Re: v4l2 + select() + read()
    • From: Gerd Knorr
  • RE: Re: v4l2 + select() + read()
    • From: Nemosoft Unv.

• Prev by Date: Re: v4l2 + select() + read()
• Next by Date: Re: v4l2 + select() + read()
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: v4l2 + select() + read()
• Next by thread: RE: Re: v4l2 + select() + read()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread