On 11 Mar 2003, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > Should we convert it to some other planar or packed format? > > It is probably a good idea to provide at least one standard format. > Pick one where the conversion is cheap, i.e. where all you have to to > is byte reordering (which might be done in one go with copying to user > space by splitting the copy_to_user() into many small calls with 16 > bytes each). Guess a planar format works best. Yes that sounds best, it would maximize the blit. Thanks, John
