On 28 Feb 2003, Ronald Bultje wrote: > Hey John, > > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 17:19, PlasmaJohn wrote: > > We're at the point where we need to do things like change inputs and > > channels. To that end, we've started coding up some ioctl support using the > > V4L/V4L2 ioctls. This is low-hanging fruit. Real integration will require a > > bit more effort, so that's deferred until the driver stabilizes a bit more. > > I'd suggest to just use standard ioctl()s from the beginning on - that > makes life much easier. Oh, absolutely. We've got case statements for both V4L1&2 versions of each ioctl. At this point, we're only interested in the property managment functions so that's easy. > > Is there a CONFIG_ directive for V4L2 so that we don't require people to > > patch their kernel until absolutely necessary? > > Yes, HAVE_V4L2 (#ifdef HAVE_V4L2 ... #endif). Great! Uh, is this 2.5.x specific or will it be valid for 2.4.something? I don't see it in Gerd's 11-v4l2-api-2.4.20.diff John
