Re: metacity and xawtv feuding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:53:53PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> Brian Craft <bcboy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > No -- only if it's suppported by your video board, and your video driver, and
> > you actually like the scaled video it produces. If any of these are false you
> > won't be using _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN, and then it doesn't work correctly.
> 
> Not surprising if you don't use _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN.  There is no
> other sane way to tell the WindowManager that you want enter
> fullscreen mode.  What do you expect?  And what is wrong with
> _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN?

I'm not sure I follow this, looking at the code. _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN is
invoked only if the video mode is *not* being set. I don't have docs for this
state, but it appears that it serves to invoke xvideo via the window manager. 

The point of the patch was that when *not* using xvideo (because in some cases
it provides very poor quality output), then metacity and xawtv don't agree on
the window positioning.

Am I missing something here? In x11/xt.c, do_fullscreen() bails out after
setting _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN via wm_fullscreen, before the video mode code 
is invoked -- which is where the patch applies.

b.c.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux