Gerd Knorr <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 06:48:02AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: > > > b) v4l2 would give me field buffers at field rate while v4l gives me > > > interlaced frames at frame rate. > > > > Not true. v4l2 gives field buffers at frame rate. If this has changed I've > > missed the announcement... > > The v4l2 API allows this. bttv hasn't implemented that yet through ... Well, I decided to give v4l2/bttv-0.9 at least a try (and just succeeded in capturing 'first light' through them - so far so good;). Field-rate capture for bttv probably isn't anywhere near the top of your todo list, or is it? Any chance I could change your priorities? (And yes, I'll do it myself if necesssary, but I'm simply not much of a kernel hack). Anyway, thanks for the helpful comments so far (that goes to all of you)! - Reinoud
