Re: Misleading informations on "official" v4l2 website

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi Michael,

Op ma 23-12-2002, om 19:43 schreef Michael Hunold:
> Additionally, no current v4l2 modules are available as a standalone
> package to compile for 2.4.x, like videodevX used to be.

Actually, http://bytesex.org/patches/ has 2.4.x "backport" patches.
They're not modules on their own, but just a kernel patch.

> Comments are very welcome.

Good to put attention on this. It needs work, soon. I just don't think
there's much work to do, other than getting people to change links on
their websites and changing (or removing) the bttv2/videodevX websites
to say that they're not the official versions. (just my humble opinion)

Ronald

-- 
Ronald Bultje <rbultje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux