Re: documentation erratum for VIDIOCSYNC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> Documentation/video4linux/API.html, which claims to be v0.1:19990430)
> for VIDIOCSYNC is contrary to how several drivers and applications use
> the flag.  In fact, the behavior that I understand from the
> documentation seems to serve no real purpose.  What is the proper
> behavior for this ioctl?

I can confirm the docs need fixing





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux