Re: Re: vic information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 04:59, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > > The original vic did not - but newer versions do.  eg:
> > > http://www-mice.cs.ucl.ac.uk/multimedia/software/vic/
> >  
> >  	AFAIR there are two H263 codecs one is H.263+ TMN11 (insanely slow) and
> >  other H.263v1 very outdated. AFAIR one of this is code from Gerd Knor.
> 
> I never wrote a H.263+ codec from scratch, I just hacked the TMN stuff
> (years ago).  Thus it is basically all TMN ...

	I didn't know which one did you implemented, but I know that H.263+ is
just TMN11...
	BTW how dificult was the wrapper ? Did you have to implement RTP
payload by yourself or this was already in the code ?
	Sometimes I think it would be nice to have H.263+ real time on VIC.

> TMN is (was?) the reference implementation.  Purpose of that encoder was
> to check out the how good H.263 compression works, it isn't designed for
> speed.
 
> Not sure what the openh323 / gnomemeeting people use these days.

	AFAIK they don use H.263 at all ....

-- 
Juanjo sin .sig :(





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux