Billy Biggs wrote:
I think you're right though. Instead of doing a libv4l that nobody would use, we should work on having lots of libs with inconsistent interfaces, but at least the code would be shared.
How about a minimal libv4l with a consistent interface for the other libraries to "plug in" to? That way, libv4l would provide a standard mechanism without enforcing the "policy" of a particular deinterlacer, scaler, etc...
-- Mark McClelland mmcclell@xxxxxxxxxxx
