Re: Re: Ooops in btaudio?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 07:44:25AM +0000, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> >  Invalid operand 0000
> > =2E..
> >  Call Trace [ hexadecimal stack trace which I know is meaningless here ]
> 
> It isn't meaningless, it is the only way to debug that problem.

Indeed.  I worded it incorrectly.  What I meant was that the stack
trace in hexadecimal number form was meaningless to display here, with
nobody having my kernel and modules loaded on their system and all.

> See
> Documentation/oops-tracing.txt (and Documentation/serial-console.txt
> maybe ...).

~sigh~  Yeah, a serial console is what I was thinking about for
getting the Ooops data.  I don't have that kind (an RS-232 Xover) of
cable here right now though.

Can Documentation/oops-tracing.txt really be applied though?  It gives
instruction when klogd is available to symbolize the addresses, or
when ksymoops can be run right after the Ooops.

Because I dynamically load modules, is it not likely that if any
modules are in the trace, by the time I reboot and can ksymoops the
crash data (captured on the serial console for instance) the address
pointers will have changed due to the dynamic module loading?

> >  <6>btaudio : buffer overrun
> 
> >  I do nothing with btaudio.
> 
> This simply can't happen if you don't use btaudio.

Sorry, again bad wording on my part.  I meant that I use the btaudio.o
driver that comes with my kernel distribution.  I don't "supplant" it
with a newer/different version as I do with v4l2 and bttv.

I definately do use btaudio when capturing/encoding.

b.

-- 
Brian J. Murrell

Attachment: pgpKX7ewl7l4U.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux