> > I have found that I can get pretty close (although the > > interlacing isnt perfect) by using video compressed as described > > above, leaving the flicker filter on, and blit-stretching each video > > frame to the full display buffer. It looks pretty close although on > > some sources the interlacing can look a little stronger than it > > should. > You are reconstructing the temporal resolution nicely, but I think that you are halving your possible vertical resolution from 576 back to 288. With conventional interlacing, eye/brain persistance would reassemble the lines of the two fields, allowing each line to be resolved. But your blit and the filter blurs each two lines together. Steve
