Re: Using usbvideo for webcam drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Quoting Mark McClelland <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Dmitri wrote:
> 
> >You do not initialize the camera in probe() - this is bad because of many
> >reasons. 
> >
> Is this still true? I realize that all probe()s are called from the same 
> khubd thread, but where is the harm in making other devices wait?

That is exactly the harm :-)

> Is a device's address assigned only after the previous
> device's probe() returns?

I think so because the hub won't see the device connect before that.

> There are a lot of other cases where a driver can spend a lot of time in 
> probe() (eg.: a kmalloc that sleeps for a long time).

The kmalloc() delay is orders of magnitude less than a bunch of
transfers. The latter can take from tens of milliseconds to tens of
seconds, depending on what you are doing with the device.

> Even with a very stripped-down probe(), won't problems start to
> appear with eg. 50 devices?

If you have so many devices then you will get some problems, one way or
another. In fact, at work I do have lots and lots of USB devices hanging
off of one computer, but normally I run out of bandwidth first.

Our devices have an LED that lights up when the internal hub is
enumerated, and it is very mesmerizing to see how the whole wall of
devices gets enumerated on reboot, one unit after another...

Thanks,
Dmitri

-- 
..you could spend *all day* customizing the title bar. Believe me. I
speak from experience."
  (By Matt Welsh)

Attachment: pgpOSbMyhHePl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux