Re: mjpegtools-1.6 - first beta

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi Edward,

On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 21:10, Edward Tandi wrote:
While we are on the subject, is there any advantage to using the AVI
format (quality wise)? How about this movtar format? Wasn't there
supposed to be a newer AVI standard to overcome this limit?

Movtar is a format written by Gernot Ziegler, one of the mjpegtools
developers. It's not really a standard but works quite nice :-). It
isn't a hackishly lib like quicktime4linux and doesn't have obscure
limitations like AVI. Quicktime is based on Adam Williams'
quicktime4linux, which is pretty much hackish and probably not 100%
"official quicktime" compatible... AVI is MS' AVI with all obscure
limitations. I don't know of any "new" AVI format, to be honest...
Anyway, which one to use is all personal preference... The quality
should be the same for all since we use the same codecs...

Ronald

-- 
-   .-.
-   /V\    | Ronald Bultje <rbultje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-  // \\   | Running: Linux 2.2.19 and OpenBSD 2.8
- /(   )\  | http://ronald.bitfreak.net/
-  ^^-^^





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux