Re: opendivx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Actually, with MPEG, using P frames gives much better looking results for the
same bitrate than only using I frames, even without the motion vector search,
which is the CPU intensive part. Just compare mp1e 1.8 and above to MJPEG.
mp1e uses P macro blocks with a (0,0) motion vector, and that's usually a win.

Ori

Alan Cox wrote:

> > I doing a project in which I intent to to encode and decode bitstream
> > using opendivx MPEG4 codec for linux for videoconferencing in real time.
> >
> > Does opendivx codec suitable for such real time application ? Anyone
> > familiar with it or know any freely available MPEG4 codec ?
>
> MPEG4 appears to have patent issues, so for the US at least it seems likely
> there is no open mpeg4 possible. Its also very CPU heavy which may make
> it a poor real time codec. For real time you generally want a very
> efficient codec that handles rapid scene changes well (at low data rates
> B and P frames are basically no hopers) and avoids cpu intensive DCT and
> the like.
>
> Take a look at codecs like CU30
>
> _______________________________________________
> Video4linux-list mailing list
> Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux