On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > This _might_ be because the sample rate is 31400Hz instead of 32000 Hz. > Is that the actual rate based on some info you have? Steve
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > This _might_ be because the sample rate is 31400Hz instead of 32000 Hz. > Is that the actual rate based on some info you have? Steve