Re: v4l2 + kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hello Gerd,

> > The thing is S_FMT and G_FMT are used for setting other formats too.
> > You can't remove S_FMT and G_FMT, so you gain nothing by forcing v4l2
> > drivers to interpret VIDIOCGVBIFMT, etc. instead.
> 
> v4l2 drivers are supported to be backward compatible to v4l, so they have
                   ^^^^^^^^^
                   supposed?
> to interpret VIDIOCGVBIFMT anyway.  And I can't see any advantages v4l2
> has here, so why support two different ways to do exactly the same?

Why are v4l2 drivers supposed to interpret VIDIOCGVBIFMT? In the
"old" v4l2-scheme, backward compatibility is entirely up to
videodevX, and that's good.

(Please note my other mail, which goes into the same directions)

>   Gerd

CU
Michael.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux