Re: switch to v4l2 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> you pull them out of a long queue. (I still think the lack of
> timestamping is the biggest problem with v4l).  There is also no method
> to tell how deep the queue actually is, so you can't even get
> approximate timing.

BTTV has a driver specific frame counter. If someone adds a V4L ioctl for
frame counter, depth I am certainly not going to object

Alan






[Index of Archives]     [Linux DVB]     [Video Disk Recorder]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Free Photo Albums]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux