Problem is, I've got drivers that need to be ported (about 4). Should I try porting v4l2-cc.[ch] to work with videodevX? Are there some instructions for weaning these drivers away from v4l2-cc.[ch]? Thanks, Chris Justin Schoeman wrote: > > Chris Worley wrote: > > > > I'm trying to upgrade some old V4L2 device drivers to 2.4 (looking at > > http://bttv-v4l2.sourceforge.net/download/videodevX-061000.tgz ). > > > > I'm noticing that the v4l2-cc.[ch] files are not used anymore. > > > > What happened? Is there any documentation that describes the changes > > that need to be made to rid yourself of dependence on these files? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chris > > When you upgrade to bttv2 + videodevX the dependancies to v4l2-cc go > away (you may have to remove the old v4l2-cc and videodev files). The > v4l2-cc system was a much more elegant way of handling the bttv > subsystems, but due to the masses of cards out there it became > hopelessly impractical to maintain the two separate access methods. > > (If anybody wants to reintegrate and maintain the v4l2-cc subsystem, > feel free!) > > -justin > > _______________________________________________ > Video4linux-list mailing list > Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list