> My preference is to stick witj 2.4.xx with some low latency kernel patches > for now, but also whats people's opinion on 2.6.0 test? 2.6.0-test works great for me :) I had some problems with the saa7134/v4l2-patches for 2.4, but that's a long time ago and I think it's all fixed. Now I just use 2.6 because it's a very nice kernel :) If you are having problems with framedrops, do you have A) Enough processor time? B) Enough capture buffers? C) A strong, clear signal? -- Regards, Christian Iversen
