Re: Misleading informations on "official" v4l2 website

[jack craig <jackc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael Hunold wrote:
> 
> Hello Jack,

hi michael,

> 
> >>I recently had an interesting discussion with someone who claimed that
> >>videodevX from Bill Dirks is the official v4l2 version...
> 
> > how about questions?
>  > whats transpiring here that has not been in the news group?
> 
> Hmm, I don't know if I understand you correctly, but there hasn't been a
> conspiracy or something.

you are right, i misunderstood your meaning. you must appreciate that
the phrase 'out of business' means more recently than it used to. :)


> >>Bill, what do you think about it? If Bill is "Out of business",
> 
> > whats this 'out of business' thing???
> 
> Sorry for my broken english: With "out of business" I mean: "no time for
> this currently, got more important things to do, so somebody else should
> do it.".

now i understand. i guess as long as the transition is well done,
i'd not personally have any heartburn with such a move.

however, after bill's contribution, this would have to clearly 
be his choice rather than peer pressure to go faster, IMHO.

> 
> I never wanted to shut down anything, simply change the site so it
> reflects the lasted developments.

certainly a recent objective, thanks for your quick explanation.

jackc...

> 
> CU
> Michael.
> 
> --
> video4linux-list mailing list
> Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Craig    ImageIntegration     831-684-1375     
jackc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx