On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 08:45:42AM +0200, Justin Schoeman wrote: > > I haven't used bttv-.8.x in a while, but it looks a lot cleaner than > bttv2, and I assume it will be a better option. I am not sure how > mature the v4l2 support is yet though. >From what I can determine it looks like it requires patching the kernel source to get v4l2 though. bttv2 does not require that. Luckily enough my distro vendor's kernel is robust enough that I don't need to build my own kernels and I am hesitant to start just for bttv 0.8. Is going from v4l2&bttv-0.7 to v4l2&bttv-0.8 really worth starting to build my own kernels? > http://www.bytesex.org - follow the bttv link. Thanx! b. -- Brian J. Murrell
