Well the truth of this is niether my linux box, nor my Windows 2K box nor a client solaris box directly attached to my parent DNS server can access Bill's web server. According to my parent DNS administrator (finger pointing time) the problem is with Bill's parent DNS server. Something to do with dual servers in the same IP subnet. I do know this I can access Bill's site via IP and traceroute works ok so it is a DNS problem. Since I can get, DNSwise that is, any where else without any problem I tend to believe my parent DNS administrator (understand I am far from a DNS expert and if they told me the sky was purple I'd believe them :-). Further, even though I did have tcp_ecn set to 1, neither changing it on the fly to "0" or recompiling the kernel without it, fixed the problem. But besides all this, Bill, I did manage to get the latest videum stuff but accessing the URL to get the latest videodevX has not been successful. Namely http://63.198.58.131/v4l2 doesnt seem to respond. Did any of the last stuff I sent you help witht he video problem? ...chris -----Original Message----- From: video4linux-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:video4linux-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Alan Cox Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 5:37 PM To: video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Web site status > Are you sure you're not running a 2.4 kernel with ECN (Explicit > Congestion Notification) turned on? Or Bill has it on on his server? > > This 'feature' has randomly prevented lots of people from accessing > various sites.... Its an IETF standard. If it causes problems the other site is broken, and there are actually very few problems sites now that cisco fixed their code. Especially as their was a cisco security alert later that made people pick up the change _______________________________________________ Video4linux-list mailing list Video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
