Gerd Knorr wrote: > The current v4l2 specs says drivers should support non-blocking reads but > may refuse partial reads if it is "inefficient to implement". This > combination simply doesn't make sense to me. IMHO we should pick one > of the more useful combinations: make partial reads mandatory or drop > non-blocking I/O support for read(). If this is the choice, I'd much rather have the non-blocking read() with select support, as this seems much more useful (for IO integration). I can't see the use for partial reads. Ben
